Learning outcomes
Foundation about 5 min
After this module you should be able to:
- Read every column of an NSE option chain, build the chain from the F&O bhavcopy, and infer the forward from put–call parity rather than from spot (9A.1).
- Decompose an option's daily price change into delta, gamma, theta and vega parts, and explain why the four OI build-up labels are a weaker signal for options than for futures.
- Define the OI and volume put–call ratios and max pain exactly; prove that max pain is the strike at which cumulative call OI below equals cumulative put OI above (Proposition 9A.3), and test "expiry pins to max pain" on data.
- Derive the effective volatility of a price driven by dealer delta hedging, state the pinning evidence (Avellaneda–Lipkin, Ni–Pearson–Poteshman, Golez–Jackwerth), and say what Indian data can and cannot reveal about dealer gamma.
- Derive the ATM straddle with its error term, relate it to the expected absolute move, and extract an event's implied variance from two expiries (Propositions 9A.5, 9A.6, 9A.9, 9A.10).
- Compute IV rank and IV percentile, and prove that the percentile is uniform under exchangeability while the rank is not.
- Read the participant-wise OI file and state its accounting identities and its limits.
- Compute a SPAN-like scenario margin for a multi-leg position, prove that it is subadditive and capped for defined-risk spreads, and analyse rolling, strangle-to-condor conversion and delta-neutral adjustments as changes of Greeks with explicit costs; state the obligations created by physical settlement of stock options.