3.3 Overbetting and the shape of
Motivation
Kelly's growth curve is asymmetric in its consequences: underbetting by half costs a quarter of the growth; overbetting by double costs all of it. Traders who estimate their edge with error should know which side of is dangerous.
Where growth turns negative#
Proposition 3.4even money: gives negative growth
For and , so that , . Consequently the unique root of satisfies , and every has .
Proof
With , and , . For ,
because for odd the bracket is and for even it is . At , pair the odd term with the even term :
For the pair is 0; for it is negative. The series converges absolutely, so . Since , is strictly concave and , has exactly one root in , and places it below . Concavity then gives on .∎
Remark 3.5 (the rule is not universal) For long-shot bets the root can lie above . With , (a 1-in-50 chance at 100:1), and . Positive skew moves the zero of to the right. The "" rule is exact in the continuous model (3.4) and true for even-money bets; for skewed payoffs compute directly.
The growth parabola#
Second-order picture Write and . For small , . This parabola peaks at with , crosses zero at , and satisfies
Betting half Kelly () keeps 75% of the growth; double Kelly () keeps none. A fractional Kelly bettor gives up little growth for each unit of variance removed.
| (multiple of Kelly) | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth as share of max, | 44% | 75% | 94% | 100% | 75% | 0% |
Worked example 3.3.1
For , : , the exact root is , and per bet. For the swing system (, ): , , and : the positively skewed R distribution moves the root slightly beyond , as Remark 3.5 predicts.